<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MDM Zinc vs. Adobe AIR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cgiinteractive.com/blog/2009/07/mdm-zinc-vs-adobe-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cgiinteractive.com/blog/2009/07/mdm-zinc-vs-adobe-air/</link>
	<description>A blog about interactive communications for marketers, designers and developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.cgiinteractive.com/blog/2009/07/mdm-zinc-vs-adobe-air/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgiinteractive.com/blog/?p=490#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you&#039;d think it would be easy to just distribute the AIR run time with the final project and have people install that first, but it&#039;s just never that simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you&#8217;d think it would be easy to just distribute the AIR run time with the final project and have people install that first, but it&#8217;s just never that simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.cgiinteractive.com/blog/2009/07/mdm-zinc-vs-adobe-air/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgiinteractive.com/blog/?p=490#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comparison. The standalone executable is a big PRO in my opinion and will likely keep us from AIR for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparison. The standalone executable is a big PRO in my opinion and will likely keep us from AIR for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

